Everywhere you look, fans are eagerly sharing their selections of the best games of 2025. However, what of the stinkers, the underperformers? We'll take a momentary detour to examine the most panned games of the year, as determined by the critical consensus on Metacritic. Is every one of these games as bad as the ratings suggest? We shall see.
10. Switch 2's Welcome Tour
Metascore: 54/100, User Score: 3.4/10
The early response to this tech demo were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a complimentary title like similar console launches. Professional assessment varied dramatically, from scathing critiques to more generous reviews that praised the delightful software underneath the controversy. In spite of the debate, the title proved to be a surprisingly robust commercial performer during its launch month.
9. Rennsport
Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10
Billed as "beyond a racing game," this simulation from European developers was met with pretty unanimous reviews. The consensus was that the game was lacking in almost every category, notably in a year packed with high-quality racing titles. In the eyes of critics, this disappointing sim was best left in the garage.
8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection
Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10
To begin with: the confusing punctuation is a minor annoyance. This anthology of 1990s-era platforming games revives a rude feline known for incessant hacky one-liners. Critics observed that these games were not good in their time and haven't gotten better with age. The improbably high user score stands as a peculiar oddity to the critical reception.
7. Nen x Impact
Metascore: 53, User Score: 3.5
This manga-based fighting game was met with widespread disappointment from both professionals and the dedicated community. Issues included a thin fighter lineup and a severe lack of gameplay modes. Fan reaction was especially negative, with some expressing a desire that the title's poor performance would have consequences for similar releases.
6. Neptunia Motorcycle Game
Metascore: 51, User Score: 5.3
Hailing from the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this motorcycle action game tasks players with gathering cute monsters. Critics argued that its effort to mimic a rolling-collection experience didn't land, coming across as more of a low-effort product than a meaningful Neptunia game. Its 3-hour duration combined with a premium price raised eyebrows.
5. Captain Blood
Metascore: 50, Audience Score: 5.3
This title is a piece of lost media from the past, seeing the light of day after nearly two decades in production delays. The publishers opted to release the game as an authentic product of its time, accepting that contemporary players might criticize its dated design. As such, many reviews noted that the tale of its resurrection was far richer than the end product.
4. Scar-Lead Salvation
Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 2.4
This anime-art action game inspired by games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. Common complaints centered on uninspired foes, samey environments, and a unengaging plot. A controversial mechanic involving the outfit degradation was universally disliked and undermined the game's enjoyment.
3. Ambulance Life
Metascore: 44, User Score: 4.9
Think of the strategic medical sims of the past, then remove the compelling story. That, according to reviews, is essentially *Ambulance Life*. Critics found the emergency response sections to be monotonous, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being tone-deaf. The overall experience was deemed largely unsatisfying.
2. Tamagotchi Plaza
Metascore: 43, User Score: 5.8
This new direction for the classic virtual pet formula transforms the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, per critics, was a dull assortment of basic activities that very soon grew tiresome. Some reviews went so far as to call it one of the most disappointing titles available on its platform, noting a dearth of depth.
1. MindsEye
Aggregate Score: 37, User Score: 2.5
Intended to be a high-profile open-world action game from a studio led by well-known figures, *MindsEye* was a notable disappointment. Reviews savaged its lousy combat, boring plot, and a plethora of horrendous bugs. Critics found it to be a regression compared to decades-old games in the action genre. Amidst the scathing reviews, a small handful of optimistic players found something to enjoy in the experience, serving as a distinct vote of confidence.